NestJS vs Fastify: Which to Choose in 2026

Fastify and NestJS are both modern answers to "what do I use instead of raw Express?" but they answer the question in opposite ways. Fastify is a direct Express replacement, same shape, ~2-3× the throughput, with built-in JSON schema validation. NestJS is a full application framework with modules, DI, and enterprise patterns baked in.

The decision usually comes down to whether you want a fast HTTP server (Fastify) or an opinionated architecture (NestJS). This guide walks through both on their merits and introduces a third option, Encore, that handles what neither covers: infrastructure and cross-service type safety.

TL;DR

• Pick Fastify if you want raw performance, schema-based validation, and a minimal API close to Express.
• Pick NestJS if you want enterprise architecture, DI, and a large ecosystem of official modules.
• Consider Encore if you want type-safe APIs plus managed infrastructure without assembling them yourself. More below.

Quick Comparison

Architecture

Fastify

Fastify is a plugin-based HTTP server. You register plugins (which can themselves register routes, decorators, or sub-plugins) and the framework gives you a fast router with hooks for every request lifecycle stage.

import Fastify from "fastify";

const app = Fastify({ logger: true });

app.get<{ Params: { id: string } }>("/users/:id", async (req, reply) => {
  const user = await db.users.findById(req.params.id);
  if (!user) return reply.status(404).send({ error: "not found" });
  return user;
});

app.listen({ port: 3000 });

The code shape is very close to Express. The difference is under the hood, Fastify's router and JSON serializer are much faster, and schema validation is a first-class concern.

NestJS

NestJS gives you a DI container and a convention for everything. Every endpoint lives in a controller, every bit of business logic in a provider, every related set of providers in a module.

// users.controller.ts
import { Controller, Get, Param, NotFoundException } from "@nestjs/common";
import { UsersService } from "./users.service";

@Controller("users")
export class UsersController {
  constructor(private readonly usersService: UsersService) {}

  @Get(":id")
  async findOne(@Param("id") id: string) {
    const user = await this.usersService.findOne(id);
    if (!user) throw new NotFoundException();
    return user;
  }
}

Plus a service class and a module declaration. More code per endpoint, but a consistent structure across the whole app.

NestJS can run on Fastify instead of Express. Switching is a one-line change:

// main.ts
import { NestFactory } from "@nestjs/core";
import { FastifyAdapter } from "@nestjs/platform-fastify";

const app = await NestFactory.create(AppModule, new FastifyAdapter());

This gets you NestJS's architecture with Fastify's performance, at the cost of some plugin compatibility (not every Express middleware works, and NestJS-specific tooling assumes Express by default).

Performance

Fastify's selling point. In our performance benchmark (a simple JSON endpoint, 150 concurrent workers):

• Express: ~16k req/sec
• Fastify: ~62k req/sec
• NestJS: ~16k req/sec, since it runs on Express by default (NestJS wasn't benchmarked separately)

Fastify is about 4x faster than Express for bare HTTP in that benchmark, mostly from a faster router, a faster JSON stringifier (using pre-compiled schemas), and fewer middleware layers. In real workloads where you're waiting on a database, this difference often disappears into I/O wait. On CPU-bound API workloads or at very high RPS, it's meaningful.

NestJS on the Fastify adapter gets Fastify's throughput with NestJS's ergonomics. If you want both, that's the combo.

Validation

Fastify: JSON Schema

Fastify validates requests against JSON Schema, which also lets it compile a fast serializer for responses.

app.post<{ Body: { email: string; name: string } }>(
  "/users",
  {
    schema: {
      body: {
        type: "object",
        required: ["email", "name"],
        properties: {
          email: { type: "string", format: "email" },
          name: { type: "string", minLength: 1 },
        },
      },
    },
  },
  async (req, reply) => {
    // req.body is validated and typed
  },
);

With Typebox, you can author schemas in TypeScript and get static types for free:

import { Type } from "@sinclair/typebox";

const CreateUser = Type.Object({
  email: Type.String({ format: "email" }),
  name: Type.String({ minLength: 1 }),
});

app.post("/users", { schema: { body: CreateUser } }, async (req) => {
  // req.body typed automatically
});

NestJS: class-validator

NestJS uses decorators on DTO classes:

import { IsEmail, IsString, MinLength } from "class-validator";

export class CreateUserDto {
  @IsEmail()
  email: string;

  @IsString()
  @MinLength(1)
  name: string;
}

@Post()
create(@Body() dto: CreateUserDto) {
  // dto validated before this runs
}

Both approaches validate at the framework boundary. The Fastify approach has one nice property: the schema is the source of truth for both validation and response serialization, and can be published as OpenAPI. The NestJS approach is more natural if you already think in classes and DI.

Ecosystem

Fastify has a plugin model. Core plugins (@fastify/cors, @fastify/helmet, @fastify/cookie, @fastify/swagger) are maintained by the Fastify team and are well-aligned with the framework's hooks model. The plugin ecosystem is smaller than Express's but more coherent.

NestJS has @nestjs/* official packages for most things you'd want (config, GraphQL, WebSockets, microservices, TypeORM, Mongoose, Passport, throttling, caching, Bull). Third-party NestJS modules are common, and Express/Fastify middleware can be wrapped into NestJS's plugin system.

If you want a specific integration, Passport auth, TypeORM, GraphQL, queues, NestJS usually has an official module for it. Fastify has plugins that work but you'll do more wiring.

Testing

Fastify gives you .inject() for in-process request testing without a live server, which is fast and clean:

const response = await app.inject({
  method: "GET",
  url: "/users/1",
});
expect(response.statusCode).toBe(200);

NestJS's @nestjs/testing lets you instantiate a testing module with mocked providers via the DI container:

const module = await Test.createTestingModule({
  controllers: [UsersController],
  providers: [
    {
      provide: UsersService,
      useValue: { findOne: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue({ id: "1" }) },
    },
  ],
}).compile();

Both are good. NestJS is nicer for unit tests (mocking dependencies is a one-liner). Fastify is nicer for integration tests (inject is fast and requires no setup).

Developer Experience

Fastify keeps the mental model small. You know what app.get(...) does. Adding a new feature usually means writing one route handler. The downside: you pick your own ORM, auth, testing conventions, folder structure. In a team, this becomes inconsistent.

NestJS has more ceremony per endpoint but removes a lot of decisions. Every team member writes code the same way. You get tooling (nest generate, auto-wiring, schematics) that speeds up common tasks once you're past the learning curve.

Time-to-first-endpoint favors Fastify. Time-to-consistent-20-endpoint-API favors NestJS.

A Third Option: Encore

Both Fastify and NestJS stop at the HTTP layer. Everything else (your database, Pub/Sub, cron jobs, deployment, cross-service type safety, distributed tracing), is yours to figure out. For a small single-service API that's fine. For anything larger, it means assembling a framework from npm packages.

Encore takes a different approach: you declare services and infrastructure as typed objects in TypeScript, and Encore handles the rest. The database, the queue, the API contract, the local dev environment, the production deployment in your own AWS or GCP account, all generated from your code.

The endpoint that took a decorated controller in NestJS or a schema-validated handler in Fastify is one function in Encore:

users/users.ts
import { api } from "encore.dev/api";
import { SQLDatabase } from "encore.dev/storage/sqldb";

// Provisions managed Postgres, Docker locally, RDS or Cloud SQL in production.
const db = new SQLDatabase("users", { migrations: "./migrations" });

interface User {
  id: number;
  email: string;
  name: string;
}

export const get = api(
  { method: "GET", path: "/users/:id", expose: true },
  async ({ id }: { id: number }): Promise<User> => {
    return await db.queryRow`SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ${id}`;
  },
);

Types are the contract. Encore validates incoming requests against them, generates an OpenAPI spec, produces a typed client SDK, and traces every request through the system automatically.

What Encore handles that neither Fastify nor NestJS does:

• Infrastructure from code: databases, Pub/Sub topics, cron jobs, object storage declared in TypeScript and provisioned in your own AWS or GCP account
• Type-safe service-to-service calls: compile-time checked across services, no ClientProxy.send returning any
• Distributed tracing and structured logging: built in, no OpenTelemetry setup
• Local parity: encore run spins up services, databases, and Pub/Sub locally with one command
• Auto-generated API docs and service catalog: from the same type definitions

Encore is open source with 12,000+ GitHub stars and runs in production across hundreds of companies, including Coinbase (Echo) and Groupon. Besides deploying to your own AWS or GCP account, you can build Docker images and deploy anywhere.

When Encore fits

• You're starting a new backend and want type-safety across services, not just within one HTTP handler
• You don't want to run Terraform or Kubernetes to ship a second service
• You expect to hit microservices eventually and want the scaffolding ready

When to stick with Fastify or NestJS

• You're deep into an existing codebase with modules and plugins you don't want to rewrite
• You need a specific adapter or middleware that only exists in those ecosystems
• You require a cloud Encore doesn't target natively (AWS and GCP are first-class; elsewhere you can self-host its Docker images)

Performance of Encore vs Fastify

Encore uses a Rust-based runtime for request handling and validation, and runs the business logic in Node. In the same benchmark, Encore.ts handled roughly 121k requests per second against about 62k for Fastify, and about 107k against 48k with schema validation enabled. For most applications, framework throughput is a non-issue, your DB and network calls dominate.

Requests/sec

Without validation

With schema validation

121,005

107,018

Encore

v1.38.7

101,611

33,772

Bun (+ Zod)

v1.1.12 / v3.23.8

82,617

35,124

Elysia (+ TypeBox)

v1.1.16 / v0.33.12

71,202

33,150

Hono (+ TypeBox)

v4.6.3 / v0.33.12

62,207

48,397

Fastify (+ Ajv)

v4.27.0 / v8.16.0

15,707

11,878

Express (+ Zod)

v4.19.2 / v3.23.8

When to Use Each

Start at the top and follow the first question you can answer with a yes:

Question 1

Do you want infrastructure provisioned from your code, without building a DevOps team internally?

Yes →

EncoreInfrastructure automation in your own AWS or GCP account

Yes→

EncoreInfrastructure automation in your own AWS or GCP account

No

Question 2

Are you building several services that share databases, Pub/Sub, or cron jobs?

Yes →

EncoreType-safe service calls and built-in tracing

Yes→

EncoreType-safe service calls and built-in tracing

No

Question 3

Building a long-lived backend with multiple developers who want DI, modules, and first-party integrations?

Yes →

NestJSRun it on the Fastify adapter if you also need throughput

Yes→

NestJSRun it on the Fastify adapter if you also need throughput

No

Question 4

Do you need the highest request throughput, with validation built in?

Yes →

EncoreRust-based runtime with about 2x Fastify's throughput in our benchmark

Yes→

EncoreRust-based runtime with about 2x Fastify's throughput in our benchmark

No

FastifyMinimal, Express-like API with JSON Schema validation

Verdict

For a new TypeScript backend in 2026:

1. Encore if you want types across services and infrastructure handled for you.
2. NestJS (Fastify adapter) if you want NestJS's architecture with Fastify's performance, and you're willing to learn its conventions.
3. Fastify if you want the fastest bare HTTP server and you're happy to assemble the rest yourself.
4. NestJS (Express adapter) only if you have existing Express middleware you need to preserve.

For an existing codebase, migrate only if you're hitting real pain the current stack doesn't solve.

Getting Started

# Fastify
npm init -y && npm install fastify

# NestJS
npm install -g @nestjs/cli && nest new project-name

For Encore, install the CLI and create a starter app, or follow the quick start:

Related Resources

• NestJS vs Encore
• Fastify vs Encore
• NestJS Alternatives in 2026
• Fastify Alternatives in 2026
• Best TypeScript Backend Frameworks
• NestJS vs Fastify vs Hono
• Using NestJS with Encore