NestJS and Encore.ts are both TypeScript-first backend frameworks, but they take fundamentally different approaches. NestJS brings Angular-style architecture with decorators and dependency injection. Encore.ts focuses on distributed systems with infrastructure automation and type-safe service communication.

Both are excellent choices for production applications. The right pick depends on what you're building and what problems you're trying to solve.

Quick Comparison

The Basics: Defining an API

Let's start with a simple REST endpoint that returns a user. This comparison highlights the architectural differences between the two frameworks.

NestJS

// users/users.controller.ts
import { Controller, Get, Param } from '@nestjs/common';
import { UsersService } from './users.service';

@Controller('users')
export class UsersController {
  constructor(private readonly usersService: UsersService) {}

  @Get(':id')
  findOne(@Param('id') id: string) {
    return this.usersService.findOne(id);
  }
}

// users/users.service.ts
import { Injectable } from '@nestjs/common';

@Injectable()
export class UsersService {
  findOne(id: string) {
    return { id, name: 'John' };
  }
}

// users/users.module.ts
import { Module } from '@nestjs/common';
import { UsersController } from './users.controller';
import { UsersService } from './users.service';

@Module({
  controllers: [UsersController],
  providers: [UsersService],
})
export class UsersModule {}

NestJS uses decorators to define routes, controllers, and services. You need to wire everything together with modules, and the dependency injection system manages instantiation. This structure provides clear separation of concerns but requires more files for simple endpoints.

Encore.ts

// users/api.ts
import { api } from "encore.dev/api";

interface User {
  id: string;
  name: string;
}

export const getUser = api(
  { method: "GET", path: "/users/:id", expose: true },
  async ({ id }: { id: string }): Promise<User> => {
    return { id, name: "John" };
  }
);

Encore uses a declarative approach. You define the endpoint with its types, and Encore handles routing, validation, and server setup. A service is simply a folder with an encore.service.ts file. This reduces boilerplate while maintaining type safety.

Verdict: NestJS provides more structure and explicit dependency management. Encore is more concise and requires less boilerplate. If you value Angular-style architecture, NestJS wins. If you want minimal ceremony, Encore wins.

Type Safety and Validation

Both frameworks provide validation, but through different mechanisms. The approach you prefer often depends on your team's background and the complexity of your validation requirements.

NestJS

NestJS uses class-validator decorators:

import { Controller, Post, Body } from '@nestjs/common';
import { IsEmail, IsString, MinLength } from 'class-validator';

class CreateUserDto {
  @IsEmail()
  email: string;

  @IsString()
  @MinLength(1)
  name: string;
}

@Controller('users')
export class UsersController {
  @Post()
  create(@Body() createUserDto: CreateUserDto) {
    // createUserDto is validated
    return { id: 1, ...createUserDto };
  }
}

You define validation rules as decorators on DTO classes. NestJS validates incoming requests automatically when using the ValidationPipe. This approach is powerful and flexible, supporting complex validation scenarios with custom decorators.

Encore.ts

import { api } from "encore.dev/api";

interface CreateUserRequest {
  email: string;
  name: string;
}

interface User {
  id: number;
  email: string;
  name: string;
}

export const createUser = api(
  { method: "POST", path: "/users", expose: true },
  async (req: CreateUserRequest): Promise<User> => {
    // req is already validated based on TypeScript types
    return { id: 1, email: req.email, name: req.name };
  }
);

Encore validates requests automatically based on your TypeScript interfaces. No decorators, no separate DTO classes. Your types serve as the single source of truth for both validation and documentation. For more complex validation, you can use built-in validation rules:

import { api } from "encore.dev/api";
import { MinLen, IsEmail } from "encore.dev/validate";

interface CreateUserRequest {
  email: string & IsEmail;
  name: string & MinLen<1>;
}

Verdict: NestJS validation is powerful and familiar to Angular developers. Encore validation is more concise and uses native TypeScript types. Choose based on your team's preferences and validation complexity.

Dependency Injection

This is where the philosophical differences are most apparent. NestJS treats DI as a core architectural pattern, while Encore takes a simpler approach.

NestJS

Dependency injection is central to NestJS:

import { Injectable, Inject } from '@nestjs/common';

@Injectable()
export class UsersService {
  constructor(
    @Inject('DATABASE') private database: Database,
    private configService: ConfigService,
  ) {}

  async findOne(id: string) {
    const connectionString = this.configService.get('DATABASE_URL');
    return this.database.query('SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = $1', [id]);
  }
}

The DI container manages lifecycle, scopes, and dependencies. This makes testing easier since you can mock dependencies, and it enforces loose coupling between components. However, it adds complexity and requires understanding the container's behavior.

Encore.ts

Encore takes a simpler approach. Infrastructure is declared at the module level:

import { api } from "encore.dev/api";
import { SQLDatabase } from "encore.dev/storage/sqldb";

const db = new SQLDatabase("users", { migrations: "./migrations" });

export const getUser = api(
  { method: "GET", path: "/users/:id", expose: true },
  async ({ id }: { id: string }) => {
    return await db.queryRow`SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ${id}`;
  }
);

Infrastructure primitives are module-level constants. For testing, Encore provides test utilities that let you mock services and databases without a DI container. This approach is simpler to understand but may feel less structured for teams used to enterprise patterns.

Verdict: If you value formal DI patterns and need fine-grained control over component lifecycle, NestJS has a more sophisticated system. Encore's approach is simpler and works well for most use cases.

Database Integration

Both frameworks support databases, but with different levels of automation.

NestJS

NestJS supports multiple ORMs through modules:

// app.module.ts
import { Module } from '@nestjs/common';
import { TypeOrmModule } from '@nestjs/typeorm';
import { User } from './users/user.entity';

@Module({
  imports: [
    TypeOrmModule.forRoot({
      type: 'postgres',
      host: process.env.DB_HOST,
      port: parseInt(process.env.DB_PORT),
      username: process.env.DB_USER,
      password: process.env.DB_PASSWORD,
      database: process.env.DB_NAME,
      entities: [User],
      synchronize: false,
    }),
    TypeOrmModule.forFeature([User]),
  ],
})
export class AppModule {}

You configure the database connection, manage connection strings, and handle migrations separately. TypeORM, Prisma, and other ORMs are well-supported. This gives you flexibility but requires more setup, especially for local development where you need to run your own database.

Encore.ts

import { SQLDatabase } from "encore.dev/storage/sqldb";

const db = new SQLDatabase("users", {
  migrations: "./migrations",
});

Encore provisions PostgreSQL automatically during local development. No Docker configuration, no connection strings, no environment variables. Migrations run on startup. You can also use any ORM like Prisma or Drizzle if you prefer, while still benefiting from automatic local provisioning.

Verdict: NestJS offers more ORM choices and configuration flexibility. Encore provides automation that significantly reduces setup time, especially for local development and when working with multiple services.

Microservices and Service Communication

This is where the frameworks differ most significantly. If you're building a distributed system, this section is critical.

NestJS

NestJS supports microservices through transport layers:

// orders/orders.controller.ts
import { Controller, Inject, Post, Body } from '@nestjs/common';
import { ClientProxy } from '@nestjs/microservices';

@Controller('orders')
export class OrdersController {
  constructor(@Inject('USERS_SERVICE') private usersClient: ClientProxy) {}

  @Post()
  async create(@Body() createOrderDto: CreateOrderDto) {
    // Call users service via message transport
    const user = await this.usersClient
      .send({ cmd: 'get_user' }, createOrderDto.userId)
      .toPromise();
    
    // Create order...
    return { orderId: 1, user };
  }
}

You configure transports (TCP, Redis, RabbitMQ, Kafka, etc.), handle serialization, and manage service discovery separately. This flexibility is powerful but requires significant infrastructure setup and introduces runtime type uncertainty.

Encore.ts

// orders/api.ts
import { api } from "encore.dev/api";
import { users } from "~encore/clients";

export const createOrder = api(
  { method: "POST", path: "/orders", expose: true },
  async (req: CreateOrderRequest) => {
    // Type-safe call, automatic service discovery
    const user = await users.getUser({ id: req.userId });
    
    // Create order...
    return { orderId: 1, user };
  }
);

Service calls look like function calls. Encore generates type-safe clients from your API definitions, handles service discovery automatically, and correlates distributed traces across service boundaries. You get a service catalog showing your architecture and how services communicate.

Verdict: NestJS offers more transport options and is more configurable. Encore makes microservices feel like a monolith to develop, with type-safe calls and zero configuration for service discovery. If you're building distributed systems, Encore's approach significantly reduces complexity.

Observability

Production systems need observability. The difference here is significant.

NestJS

NestJS requires manual observability setup:

import { Injectable, NestInterceptor, ExecutionContext, CallHandler } from '@nestjs/common';
import { Observable } from 'rxjs';
import { tap } from 'rxjs/operators';
import { trace } from '@opentelemetry/api';

@Injectable()
export class TracingInterceptor implements NestInterceptor {
  intercept(context: ExecutionContext, next: CallHandler): Observable<any> {
    const tracer = trace.getTracer('my-service');
    const span = tracer.startSpan('request');
    
    return next.handle().pipe(
      tap({
        next: () => span.end(),
        error: (err) => {
          span.recordException(err);
          span.end();
        },
      }),
    );
  }
}

You configure OpenTelemetry, set up exporters, create interceptors, and wire everything together. You also need to configure log aggregation, metrics collection, and dashboard setup. This is standard for most frameworks, but it represents significant initial investment.

Encore.ts

import { api } from "encore.dev/api";
import log from "encore.dev/log";

export const getUser = api(
  { method: "GET", path: "/users/:id", expose: true },
  async ({ id }: { id: string }) => {
    log.info("fetching user", { userId: id });
    // Every database query, API call, and service call is traced automatically
    return { id, name: "John" };
  }
);

Distributed tracing works out of the box. Database queries, service calls, and Pub/Sub messages all appear in traces automatically. You get a local development dashboard with tracing included. For production deployments with Encore Cloud, you also get metrics, alerting, and integrations with Grafana and Datadog.

Verdict: Encore provides built-in observability without configuration, saving days of setup. NestJS requires significant investment but offers more customization options for teams with specific observability requirements.

Learning Curve

NestJS

NestJS has a steep learning curve. You need to understand:

• Decorators and metadata
• Dependency injection and providers
• Modules and module organization
• Guards, interceptors, pipes, and filters
• Exception filters and error handling
• Various transport layers for microservices

The official documentation is comprehensive, but there's a lot to learn before you're productive. Teams with Angular experience will ramp up faster.

Encore.ts

Encore has a gentler learning curve. The core concepts are:

• APIs defined with the api() function
• Services as folders with encore.service.ts
• Infrastructure primitives (databases, Pub/Sub, cron) as TypeScript objects

If you know TypeScript, you can be productive quickly. The patterns scale as you need them, and the documentation focuses on practical examples.

Verdict: NestJS requires more upfront investment but provides extensive architectural patterns. Encore is faster to learn and lets you ship quickly while maintaining production-quality standards.

When to Choose NestJS

NestJS makes sense when:

• Your team has Angular experience and wants familiar patterns
• You need formal dependency injection for testing and modularity
• You're building a GraphQL API and want first-class support
• You value extensive enterprise patterns like guards, interceptors, and filters
• You need specific message transports like Kafka or RabbitMQ with full control

When to Choose Encore.ts

Encore.ts makes sense when:

• You're building microservices or distributed systems and want type-safe service communication
• You want local infrastructure automation (databases, Pub/Sub without Docker)
• You want built-in observability without configuring OpenTelemetry
• You prefer minimal boilerplate and native TypeScript types
• You're building enterprise applications and want to move fast without sacrificing quality

Getting Started

The best way to decide is to try both:

• NestJS First Steps
• Encore.ts Quickstart

You might also find our guide to Best TypeScript Backend Frameworks helpful for understanding how both compare to other options, or our Express.js vs Encore.ts comparison if you're coming from Express.

Have questions about choosing a framework? Join our Discord community where developers discuss architecture decisions daily.