What to use when you need more infrastructure control than a shared platform
Fly.io earned its reputation by solving global distribution: run containers close to your users across 35+ regions without managing servers in each one. For applications where geographic latency matters, that's a real advantage.
The limitations show up in other areas. Your containers run on Fly's hardware with no option to bring your own cloud account. Fly Volumes for persistent storage have had reliability concerns. Pricing can be unpredictable with Fly Machines, and the operational model requires more Fly-specific knowledge than other platforms (deploying, scaling, and debugging all go through flyctl with Fly-specific concepts).
This guide covers alternatives for teams looking for more infrastructure control, simpler operational models, or different approaches to deployment.
| Feature | Encore | Render | Railway | Coolify | DO App Platform |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deploy target | Your AWS/GCP account | Render's infrastructure | Railway's infrastructure | Your own servers | DigitalOcean |
| Infrastructure ownership | Full (your account) | None | None | Full (self-hosted) | None |
| Global regions | AWS/GCP regions (30+) | Limited | Limited | Your choice | 13+ regions |
| Database | RDS / Cloud SQL (auto-provisioned) | Managed Postgres | Managed Postgres | Self-managed | Managed Postgres |
| Pub/Sub | Built-in (SNS+SQS / GCP Pub/Sub) | Manual | Manual | Manual | Manual |
| Persistent storage | S3 / GCS (auto-provisioned) | Disk | Volumes | Self-managed | Spaces |
| AI agent support | MCP server, infra in same code agents read | Manual | Manual | Manual | Manual |
| Billing | Native AWS/GCP billing plus Encore plan | Platform billing | Platform billing | Your server costs | Platform billing |
Encore is an alternative for teams that want a managed deployment workflow without operating individual Machines, volumes, and process groups. APIs, services, and supported infrastructure declared with Encore's open source Infra SDK for TypeScript and Go form an application model used for local development and deployment.
Encore services do not map one-to-one to Fly Machines. A service is a logical code and API boundary, while compute size, regions, scaling, and networking belong to the target environment.
For AI-first development workflows, agents can work from that application model instead of reconstructing the backend from Machine configuration. Type safety and static analysis provide build-time guardrails.
import { api } from "encore.dev/api";
import { SQLDatabase } from "encore.dev/storage/sqldb";
import { Bucket } from "encore.dev/storage/objects";
// RDS on AWS, Cloud SQL on GCP, Docker Postgres locally.
const db = new SQLDatabase("app", { migrations: "./migrations" });
// S3 on AWS, GCS on GCP, local storage during development.
const uploads = new Bucket("uploads", { versioned: false });
export const getItem = api(
{ method: "GET", path: "/items/:id", expose: true },
async ({ id }: { id: string }) => {
return await db.queryRow`SELECT * FROM items WHERE id = ${id}`;
}
);
The code declares the service and the resources it uses. Encore chooses their local or cloud implementation for each environment instead of translating fly.toml Machine settings into application code.
The backend has a source-level model. Encore reads services, APIs, and resource relationships from the application code. Fly.io starts from process groups and Machine configuration.
AI agents work from the same model as developers. APIs and supported infrastructure are type-safe declarations, with static analysis catching invalid usage at build time. Agents can use the service graph, schemas, and traces instead of inferring the system from Machine configuration.
Infrastructure is portable beyond a hosting vendor. the Encore platform deploys to AWS or GCP, including your own cloud account for production, and Encore can build standard Docker images for self-hosting. Workloads that depend on attached disks, GPUs, SSH access, or direct Machine lifecycle control remain a stronger fit for Fly.io or another compute platform.
Machine lifecycle controls, attached volumes, Fly private DNS, and per-Machine placement do not have direct Encore equivalents. Fly Postgres and Fly.io Managed Postgres cannot be imported directly into the Encore platform, though an Encore application can use them as external databases where secure connectivity is available.
Encore and Fly.io can run different parts of the same system. Services can communicate over an authenticated network path, but Fly private DNS does not extend outside its private network and therefore cannot provide that connection by itself.
Render is the simplest managed alternative. Connect a repo, pick a runtime, deploy. Render has native support for background workers, cron jobs, and managed Postgres. The dashboard is clean and the deploy pipeline is straightforward.
Render is a shared PaaS. You don't control the underlying infrastructure, and a platform incident affects your app even when your code is fine. Pricing is usage-based. If you're leaving Fly.io because of infrastructure control, Render has the same model.
Railway offers a polished deployment experience with built-in Postgres, Redis, and a template marketplace. The developer experience is smooth and the dashboard provides good visibility into deployments and logs.
Same shared-infrastructure model as Render and Fly.io. Railway solves the developer experience problem well but doesn't change the infrastructure ownership story. If you're leaving Fly.io for control reasons, Railway won't address that.
Coolify is an open-source deployment platform you install on your own server. It gives you a Fly.io-like dashboard on infrastructure you control, with Docker-based deployments and one-click service installations.
You take on the operational burden: OS patches, security updates, monitoring, scaling, and backup configuration. For teams with the ops capacity, it's a cost-effective way to own your deployment platform. For teams that left Fly.io to reduce operational complexity, self-hosting adds more rather than less.
DigitalOcean App Platform is a managed PaaS within the DigitalOcean ecosystem. If you're already using DigitalOcean for other infrastructure (Droplets, Spaces, Managed Databases), App Platform integrates with those services.
Less flexible than Fly.io in terms of global distribution and configuration options. App Platform is the simplest option on this list for teams that want minimal operational overhead and predictable costs, but the same shared-infrastructure tradeoffs apply.
Teams leaving Fly.io usually fall into two groups: those who want simpler operations, and those who want more infrastructure control.
Render and Railway give you simpler operations. The deployment experience is more straightforward than Fly.io's, with less platform-specific tooling to learn. You trade global distribution for simplicity. DigitalOcean App Platform fits the same category with tighter integration into the DigitalOcean ecosystem.
Coolify gives you infrastructure control through self-hosting, at the cost of taking on all operational responsibilities yourself.
Encore gives you infrastructure control without the operational burden. Your backend deploys to standard AWS or GCP services in your own cloud account, with native billing, no shared failure domains, and built-in observability. For teams that want to own their infrastructure without the complexity that pushed them away from Fly.io in the first place, Encore is the most practical path.
Ship without waiting on Terraform
Encore lets developers and agents define application infrastructure directly in code, then automatically provisions it from local development to production in your AWS or GCP account.