// Articles
Guides, tutorials, and comparisons to help you build better backend applications.
Terragrunt is Terraform plus scaffolding. Here's when the scaffolding earns its keep.
Measured token spend across Encore, Express, Fastify, Hono, and NestJS when Claude Code builds the same realistic backend project.
Encore came in at $6.29 of token spend across three benchmark runs. NestJS came in at $12.69 for the same work with fewer passing tests.
We benchmarked Claude Code on five TypeScript backends. Cursor uses the same models, so the framework ranking and the numbers behind it port over directly.
We benchmarked Claude Code on five TypeScript backend frameworks. Only one shipped production-ready code on the first pass, and only one had a CLAUDE.md and MCP server in the box.
Five frameworks, the same coding agent, the same tests, and a 36-check production-readiness rubric. Which framework ships code an AI agent can build production-ready in one pass?
Hono ran cheapest in our AI-readiness benchmark and collapsed worst when the test suite started probing for production-readiness.
Fastify was the closest non-Encore result in our AI-readiness benchmark, and reaching that result still cost about twice as many tokens.
Claude Code on NestJS cost about twice as many tokens as the same agent on Encore, and shipped fewer working production-readiness checks.
What Claude Code shipped when we gave it the same backend tasks on Express and on Encore.
What BaaS is, the modern provider landscape, and how teams plan the eventual exit
A practical guide to designing, building, and operating event-driven systems