Oct 23, 20265 min read

FastAPI vs Django

How FastAPI and Django compare on async, validation, data access, admin and project structure, with the same endpoint written in each.

FastAPI and Django are the two Python frameworks most teams compare when starting a backend in 2026. FastAPI is an async API layer built on type hints, and Django is a full application framework that includes its own ORM and admin. Picking one decides how much you assemble yourself and how the codebase looks after a year of growth.

The main differences:

  • FastAPI is ASGI and async-first, while Django supports async views on top of a mostly synchronous ecosystem.
  • FastAPI validates requests from Pydantic models in the handler signature, while Django validates through forms or Django REST framework serializers.
  • Django ships an ORM, migrations, auth and an admin, while FastAPI leaves data access to libraries you choose.
  • FastAPI generates OpenAPI docs from your types, while Django needs DRF or django-ninja for that.

FastAPI vs Django at a glance

CapabilityEncoreFastAPIDjango
RoleInfrastructure SDK added to either frameworkAPI frameworkFull application framework
Server interfaceFrom the frameworkASGIWSGI or ASGI
ValidationFrom the frameworkPydantic models from type hintsForms or DRF serializers
Data accessPostgres declared in code, provisioned locally and in your cloudYour choice of libraryBuilt-in ORM and migrations
Admin and authFrom the frameworkLibraries you addIncluded
API docsFrom the frameworkOpenAPI generated automaticallyThrough DRF or django-ninja

FastAPI: async APIs from type hints

FastAPI reads the handler signature to parse and validate input, then generates an OpenAPI schema and interactive docs from the same types. Handlers can be async def and await database and network calls, which the FastAPI async guide explains along with when plain def is the better choice.

import os from contextlib import asynccontextmanager import asyncpg from fastapi import FastAPI, Request from pydantic import BaseModel class Signup(BaseModel): email: str @asynccontextmanager async def lifespan(app: FastAPI): app.state.pool = await asyncpg.create_pool(os.environ["DATABASE_URL"]) yield await app.state.pool.close() app = FastAPI(lifespan=lifespan) @app.post("/users", status_code=201) async def create_user(req: Signup, request: Request) -> dict: await request.app.state.pool.execute( "INSERT INTO users (email) VALUES ($1)", req.email ) return {"email": req.email}

FastAPI does not include an ORM or a migration tool. Teams usually add SQLAlchemy with Alembic, SQLModel or a driver such as asyncpg directly, and auth comes from security utilities plus a library of your choosing.

Django: the application framework

Django gives you models, migrations, sessions, auth and the Django admin, which generates a management UI from your models. For JSON APIs most projects add Django REST framework or django-ninja.

import json from django.db import models from django.http import HttpRequest, JsonResponse from django.views.decorators.csrf import csrf_exempt from django.views.decorators.http import require_POST class User(models.Model): email = models.EmailField(unique=True) @csrf_exempt @require_POST def create_user(request: HttpRequest) -> JsonResponse: email = json.loads(request.body)["email"] user = User.objects.create(email=email) return JsonResponse({"id": user.pk, "email": user.email}, status=201)

Django has supported async views since 3.1, and the ORM has async methods such as acreate. The Django async documentation notes that transactions do not yet work in async mode, so code that needs them runs as a synchronous function wrapped with sync_to_async.

Performance and concurrency

Both frameworks can run on an ASGI server, which the ASGI specification defines as the async successor to WSGI. FastAPI benefits more because its handlers and common libraries are async end to end. A Django app with synchronous views scales by adding worker processes. In both cases the database is usually the bottleneck before the framework is.

Adding infrastructure to either framework with Encore

Encore combines the framework you chose with infrastructure declared in Python. It is an infrastructure SDK installed as encore-dev, and FastAPI or Django keeps routing and request handling. Postgres databases, Pub/Sub topics, object storage buckets, cron jobs and secrets become module-level declarations that Encore discovers and provisions.

With FastAPI, the signup handler writes to a declared database and publishes an event, and encore.start() in the lifespan hook starts the subscriptions:

from contextlib import asynccontextmanager import encore from encore import pubsub from encore.storage import postgres from fastapi import FastAPI from pydantic import BaseModel db = postgres.Database("users", migrations="./migrations") class Signup(BaseModel): email: str signups = pubsub.Topic[Signup]("signups") async def send_welcome(message: pubsub.Message[Signup]) -> None: print("welcome", message.data.email) welcome = pubsub.Subscription[Signup](signups, "send-welcome", handler=send_welcome) @asynccontextmanager async def lifespan(app: FastAPI): await encore.start() yield app = FastAPI(lifespan=lifespan) @app.post("/users", status_code=201) async def create_user(req: Signup) -> dict: row = await db.query( "INSERT INTO users (email) VALUES ($1) RETURNING id", req.email ).first() await signups.publish(req) return {"id": row["id"] if row else None}

With Django, the ORM keeps working as before. settings.py reads the connection string from the declared database, and Django manages the schema through its own migrations:

from psycopg.conninfo import conninfo_to_dict from encore.storage import postgres db = postgres.Database("app") connection = conninfo_to_dict(db.connection_string) DATABASES = { "default": { "ENGINE": "django.db.backends.postgresql", "NAME": connection.pop("dbname"), "USER": connection.pop("user", ""), "PASSWORD": connection.pop("password", ""), "HOST": connection.pop("host", ""), "PORT": connection.pop("port", ""), "OPTIONS": connection, } }

encore run starts Postgres locally along with the topics and buckets, and the CLI also runs Django management commands through encore exec so they get the same configuration. Cron jobs do not run locally or in preview environments.

A deploy provisions the same declarations in your own AWS or GCP account.

An agent that adds a topic to a Django view writes the declaration in the same diff, and the change runs locally before review. Cloud access sits with Encore's IAM role, not the agent. The AI integration guide covers the rules files that teach an agent these conventions.

Python support is in beta, and you can request access.

Try Encore →

How to choose

  • FastAPI for JSON APIs with async I/O and type-hint validation.
  • Django for relational apps that need an admin and auth from day one.

Either choice works with Encore when you want databases and queues running locally and provisioned in your own cloud account.

Frequently asked questions

Should I use FastAPI or Django?

Use FastAPI for JSON APIs where async handlers and type-hint validation matter most. Use Django when the app is relational and benefits from an ORM, migrations, an admin and auth that come with the framework.

Is FastAPI faster than Django?

FastAPI on an ASGI server usually handles more concurrent I/O-bound requests than synchronous Django views. Django also supports async views, but much of its ecosystem is synchronous, and database queries tend to dominate response time in both.

Can Django build APIs like FastAPI?

Yes. Django REST framework is the most common choice, and django-ninja adds type-hint-driven schemas that feel close to FastAPI while keeping the Django ORM and admin.

How do I add Postgres and Pub/Sub to a FastAPI or Django app?

Install the encore-dev package and declare postgres.Database and pubsub.Topic as module-level variables. In FastAPI, call encore.start() in the lifespan hook. In Django, read db.connection_string in settings.py so the ORM uses the Encore-managed database. encore run starts Postgres locally, and a deploy provisions the resources in your own AWS or GCP account.

Can an AI coding agent switch a project from Django to FastAPI?

It can port routes one at a time, but the ORM is the large part. Models and admin screens have no direct FastAPI equivalent, so most teams keep Django or pick a separate ORM such as SQLAlchemy before asking an agent to move code.

Deploy to your cloud on AWS and Google Cloud
without managing infrastructure

Encore lets developers and agents define application infrastructure directly in code, then automatically provisions it from local development to production in your AWS or GCP account.

~/orders — claude
Claude Code
Claude Code v2.1.180Opus 5.5~/orders